Lilux-help

lilux-help@lilux.lu

584 discussions

by Eric Dondelinger

Hi Brent, > Found in /etc/named.conf: > > # The forwarders record contains a list of servers to which > queries > # should be forwarded. Enable this line and modify the IP > address to > # your provider's name server. Up to three servers may be > listed. > > forwarders { 192.0.2.1; 192.0.2.2; }; > > I think what you need to configure is forwarders. Tried, didn't work out as I wanted (was quite the same result as with forward first). My problem: for some subdomains, I delegate DNS to their respective servers, on the internal network. Example: External: domain.lu is handled on my external servers. The MX points to the external mail servers. Internal: My internal DNS servers handle domain.lu, with more and different data than what's seen externally. sub1.domain.lu gets delegated to dns.sub1.domain.lu. Now, without forwarders, when I do a dig mx @dns1.admin.domain.lu sub1.domain.lu I'll get the answer as returned by the dns.sub1.domain.lu server, say mail.sub1.domain.lu. If I add forwarders, pointing to the external DNS servers, for the same query I get an answer from the external servers, i.e. giving the external mail servers (say, mail.domain.lu) - so instead of internal mail for sub1 going thus to mail.sub1.domain.lu, they'll go to the external mailserver mail.domain.lu (catching everything for domain.lu and routing it to the internal network), creating a mail loop. I tried this also on bind9 by now, the effect remains the same as on bind8. I guess I'll just have to add my external servers to the root hints file (no worry, I'll test before actually putting it in production). Anyway, if VeriSlime goes through with putting Sitefinder back up, we'll all have to fiddle around with our DNS servers more... Since the "new" servers are of a more respectable power than the current ones, I guess the current problems might just go away as soon as we switch... but we'll see. I love playing with Linux/Alpha ;-) Greets Eric

22 years, 6 months

FOSDEM, anyone?

by Dalibor Topic

Hi all, I was wondering if any if you guys are going to FOSDEM [1] this year, and what sort of public transport possibilities there are to get from luxembourg to brussels, i.e. what you guys can recommend? cheers, dalibor topic [1] http://www.fosdem.org

22 years, 6 months

Re: [Lilux-info] Member ginn bei LiLux?! Assemblée générale.

by Eric Dondelinger

Salut, desen mail wier eigentlech besser bei lilux-help opgehuewen, dofier aentferen ech emol op dei Lescht... On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Yves Schintgen wrote: > Moien alleguer, > > Folgendes: > * Wat muss ech maachen fir Member an äerem LiLux-Club ze ginn? > Informéiert mech wegl (Memberskaart, Baitrag, Mutprouf, keng Ahnung, > asw...). Ah, di neideg Informatiounen sin nach net um neien Site, dat misst nogeholl gin an zwar meigelechst rapid. Den Beitrag as IIRC 15 EUR, ze iwerweisen op en Konnt wou ech leider den IBAN Code net wees (Hint: ech hun fir dest Joer och nach net bezuehlt). Et wier dann natiirlech och gudd, wann eisen Sekretaer den Numm an soss Coordonneen weisst. Dat wor dann och schons di ganz Muttprouf. > [Ech kennen den Alain Knaff, hien huet mir gehollef fir de Server zu > Elwen an > der Primärschoul mam LLL-system ze installéieren. Schreift roueg "Ecole > Primaire > Troisvierges" matt op äer LLL-Lescht!] Dat as dann um Alain sech ze ameseieren ;-) > * Ganz ganz gäer geif ech un äerer: > "Assemblée Générale" 2004 Date: 20h00 on 26th Feburary 2004 > Location: LGL - Luxembourg/Limpertsberg > deelhuelen, mee hunn deen Dag Gebuertsdag, esou dass dann eng Sortie > matt > der Frendinn geplangt ass (huet zoufälleg grad deeselwechte Gebuertsdag, > also > keng Chance fir ze entkommen!). Et muss een Prioriteiten setzen am Liewen (wann een eent huet) ;-) > Ech wier frou wann der do keint erwähnen, dass ech well Member bei iech > ginn a > mech well dofir asetzen fir Linux an Opensource Software an de Schoulen > ze förderen. > Ech denken et ass e gudde Wee fir vun der monopolistescher MS Stellung > wegzekommen! Keen Widersproch vun hei ze erwaarden ;-) Schein dass nach Leit sech fir esou Saachen kennen begeeschteren! > Et wäert allerdengs net esou einfach ginn (sinn am Moment amgaangen (cf > Alain!) decke Buttek matt > mengem Aarbechtskolleeg ze kreien, also ech verstinn dei Windows-User > net, dei dach souweisou > hieren Office och net kaaft hunn an awer wellen um illegale > festhaalen....). Do heescht et, net zevill Drock maachen - den User'en hieren Leidensdrock as grouss, an freier oder speider, wann een hinnen nemmen seet dass eng Alternativ existeiert, kommen se schons vum selwen froen fir sech dat unzekucken an ze probeieren. Een Wonnermettel heivir as Knoppix - apropos, huet schons een di nei aus der aktueller c't probeiert? Wanns de par contre zevill Drock mes (iwerdriwen missioneiers), dann verleiers de Goodwill, an di Saach geet schief. > Allez, dat war et mol, > haalt mech um Lafenden wann et Neies gett. Wanns de op den Mailingleschten ageschriwen bas, misst dat quasi vum Selwen goen. > Thanks! > matt beschte Greiss, > > Yves Schintgen > L-Basbellain > sevy(a)vo.lu (op des Adress aentwerten wegl!) > www.sevy.lu Scheinen Bonjour, a wellkomm am Club, Eric

22 years, 6 months

Re: KDE auf letzebuergisch?

by Thierry Coutelier

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, Gute idee. Wir haben schon 2 interessierten. Jang ist schon dabei Mozilla zu übersetzen aber kann ein wenig mit der problematik helfen. Paul hat Interesse sich darum zu kümmern und weitere werden auch Helfen in Zukunft. Ich habe eine mailing-liste eingerichtet so dass wir es einfacher haben die Informationen weiterzugeben. ~ http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-traduct Heiko Evermann wrote: | Hallo, | | KDE ist Euch ja sicherlich ein Begriff (www.kde.org) KDE wird schon in eine | ganze Reihe von Sprachen übersetzt (siehe i18n.kde.org) Letzebuergisch ist | noch nicht dabei. | | Hat von Euch vielleicht jemand Interesse, damit anzufangen? | | Ich selbst bin mit ein paar anderen Leuten dabei, KDE ins Plattdeutsche zu | übersetzen. Falls Ihr Leute kennt, die mit einer letzebuergischen Übersetzung | anfangen möchten, könnten wir Euch vielleicht bei den ersten Schritten | behilflich sein. | | Herzliche Grüße, | | Heiko Evermann | - -- Thierry Coutelier No Patents on Software: http://www.linux.lu/epatent -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKP7vPOfrcNNQX7oRAj76AKCII92nIHxmQhJ5E3dzUrEk5uXJqwCguzro lvqBWygcfw2wbNWnlJUern4= =MSI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

22 years, 6 months

[Fwd: KDE auf letzebuergisch?]

by Thierry Coutelier

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Thierry Coutelier No Patents on Software: http://www.linux.lu/epatent -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKOwCPOfrcNNQX7oRAhmRAJ0RjclmChPkZWROA+S5W3im81yXIQCdH0YV 5jJY+BXwEfJGalgeDnyboUU= =aZeC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

22 years, 6 months

(no subject)

by Béni & Joe

Hi, Je suis nouveau dans le club lilux depuis novembre 2003, j'aimerai discuté à propos de serveur linux, je configure à la maison de machine sous redhat, relié par un câble croisé , je rencontre déjà des problème avec NFS, mais je pense que j'ai fait une connerie sur les deux machines lorsque j'ai configuré les firewall à mon avis j'ai aucun service qui peut passer, j'ai configuré tous mes services sans mettre d'adresse de passage.Hi j'aurais besoin d'aide pour rectifier la bêtise que j'ai faites de plus je me lance sur la configuration compléter de serveur dons j'aimerai bien converser avec des experts administrateurs pour partager des points de vus et bénéficier de leur expérience. Hi merci d'avance. joseph Manganaro guedes(a)pt.lu Sandweiler LUXEMBOURG.

22 years, 6 months

Linux on Alpha

by Eric Dondelinger

Hi guys, does anyone here on the list have experience with Linux on Alpha? If so, do you have experience with Debian GNU/Linux on Alpha? I've got some troubles here with SRM-only AlphaServers, getting the system to even boot one of these boot images (hangs at "jumping to bootstrap code", doesn't even get to the bootloader). TIA, Eric

22 years, 6 months

DNS question

by Eric Dondelinger

Hi, I have a (possibly stupid) question about DNS and bind. Let's suppose I have a network with DMZ, with external and internal DNS servers, with different definitions for my domain in both (MX is different when seen from outside than from inside, more stuff on the inside, both configured as masters). Now, for whatever reason, my internal servers are slower to resolve external addresses than the external ones, and I'd like to use those as forwarders, for stuff other than my own domain (and subdomains), instead of going directly to the root servers. When I try to go through the "forward first" option, it seems that *all* requests go to the external DNS servers, which is definitely not wanted - I want the internal servers to continue serving requests for my own domain or subdomains. I didn't as yet find the correct way to implement this (maybe still not enough coffee or I didn't hit upon the right manual/ howto/whatever - checked google, ISC, tldp, ...). Could someone point me the right way, if it's doable at all? TIA, Eric

22 years, 6 months

what Linux detractors won't do...

by Eric Dondelinger

Hi, it's sometimes strange what you can see online involving our dear Tux... http://meph.eu.org/ Greetings, Eric [I managed over 500 ;-)]

22 years, 6 months

Help with nmap (and ssh)

by Serge Marelli

OK, so I'm paranoid... I checked my own computer with nmap and got the following result: Interesting ports on $MYHOST ($MYIPADDRESS): (The 1641 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed) Port State Service 22/tcp open ssh 111/tcp open sunrpc 6000/tcp open X11 Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.612 seconds Now some more details; I was running nmap in user mode, not as root, I know the result would be different, for the time being I'll work with this, I'll check more later. About the results : I'm a bit surprised that ssh is opened, I don't remember setting up any sshd daemon, however, I remember Brent doing something on my machine during the Linuxdays, so it's not entirely impossible, I will disable it for the time being. I'm a bot more worried about the other two. I don't see what I might be doing with Sun's RPC and wish to disable this (any hint welcome). The same is true about X11; could anyone tell me why X11 is opening a port on my machine, I don't intend to have anyone connect via X11 to my host. I expect I may have to toy with inetd and other startup scripts in order to disable the nasty services/daemons. I hope I won't screw up my system too much or too fast. About ssh, is there a way how I can set up some identification so that only specific remote users or users from specific hosts may connect to my system through ssh? Would "anyone" be able to connect (assuming s/he knows a username & password on my system)? thanks Serge -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Software patents kill technical innovation" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Serge Marelli, E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LiLux : http://www.linux.lu/ Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/ over 200,000 votes & 2000 firms against software patents http://noepatents.org/

22 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

Lilux-help